Insurance Space

President Barack Obama is trying to revive his stalled national health care overhaul by taking the fight to the private insurance companies.

Mr. Obama on Monday will propose giving U.S. officials the power to limit rate hikes by health insurance companies, in a last-ditch bid to salvage his signature issue.

The proposal would give the federal Health and Human Services Department – in conjunction with state authorities – the power to deny egregious premium increases, roll them back, or demand rebates for consumers, said a White House official, speaking Sunday on condition of anonymity because details have not yet been officially released.

Health insurers across the country are dramatically increasing rates and slashing benefits for many of the 17 million consumers who have individual insurance policies. The issue is being addressed by the President, as he attempts to create an affordable insurance package in his overhaul of healthcare in the United States.

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield in California, for example, has announced a rate increase of 39 to 60%. Currently, however, consumers have very little option except to pay the increase or drop coverage as affordable options are few.

Revving up for next week’s bipartisan health care summit, President Barack Obama slammed greedy health insurance companies on Saturday.

A California insurance firm is hiking rates by an average of 25 percent, he said, while one in Kansas is boosting rates by up to 20 percent.

Obama’s right-on money quote in his Saturday weekly address:

“The bottom line is that the status quo is good for the insurance industry and bad for America. Over the past year, as families and small business owners have struggled to pay soaring health care costs, and as millions of Americans lost their coverage, the five largest insurers made record profits of over $12 billion.”

Dramatic increases in health insurance rates aren’t limited to California, according to a report issued Thursday by the Obama administration that found insurers had asked for large rate hikes in at least six other states.

The report by the Department of Health and Human Services found, for example, that UnitedHealth, Tufts and Blue Cross requested rate increases of up to 16 percent in Rhode Island. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan sought to raise rates by as much as 56 percent. Increases were also reported in Maine, Washington, Oregon and Connecticut.

Big, dominant insurance companies in Michigan and five other states continue to seek large rate hikes, a sign that the U.S. health insurance system is broken and needs reform, the nation’s health chief said today.

Citing a 56% rate hike that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan sought last year for non-Medicare customers who buy their own insurance, Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said big increases sought “highlight the need to address comprehensive health reform.” She spoke in a media briefing from her Bethesda, Md.

As the prospect of a major health care overhaul expires with a terminal case of filibuster, the last week provided a clear diagnosis of what we will get instead.

We have seen the future, and it looks like Anthem Blue Cross.

Last week Anthem, providing coverage to 800,000 individual buyers in California, announced rate increases for next year of as much as 39 percent.

That’s not a misprint, even if you couldn’t afford to get your eyes checked lately.

First adopted for auto, property and casualty insurance under Proposition 103, “prior approval” or “rate regulation,” as it is known, has saved consumers billions of dollars. That’s why I am reintroducing legislation that would extend Proposition 103 to health insurance. Why would California provide less government oversight for health insurance – which can save people’s lives – than for auto insurance?

Today, the state Department of Insurance has only limited ability to explore whether the benefits covered by a health insurance policy are proportional to the premiums paid. If less than 70 percent of health care premium dollars are spent on providing health care, the insurance commissioner may investigate. Unfortunately, these “medical loss ratios” can be manipulated, and thus Californians have been hit with rate increase after rate increase with no intervention by the state.

US insurer MetLife is to acquire American International Group’s (AIG) insurance business in a deal worth $15 million, news reports have claimed.

MetLife, which is the largest insurance company in the US, is expected to offer AIG $8 million in stock and the rest in cash for the purchase of Alico.

Up to $5 billion of the funds is thought to be coming from a bridge loan from banks including Bank of America, JPMorgan, Credit Suisse Group and Deutsche Bank.

If the Green River rises over its banks, there’s a chance that people all over Washington could help pay for the damage.

State leaders are contemplating the creation of a state-run insurance pool that would help businesses in Kent, Auburn and other communities along the river.

The companies have struggled to find insurance companies that will sell them flood insurance since rains last year weakened a hillside next to Howard Hanson Dam.

The state Senate voted 30-18 Tuesday to authorize the state insurance commissioner to create such a “joint underwriting association.” Senate Bill 6240 now goes to the House.

The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote later this week on whether to repeal a decades-long anti-trust exemption for health insurance companies.

It’s a small piece of what was included in the original House health care reform bill. It would be the first major legislative action on overhauling health care since Democrats lost their supermajority in the Senate last month. Insurers say Congress should leave the exemption alone, but others say repealing it would lead to lower premiums.